The website was developed by students with special needs during their internship at the Faculty of Information Technology to support and implement the terms of reference of the Department of Information Technology.
Persons with Disabilities, M — click legend to filter
6 WHO Regions
Disability Types
Global estimate, M (including comorbidities)
6 Categories
Population Forecast 2024–2030
Growth trend accounting for population aging
+13.4% over period
Top 10 Countries by Population
Estimates based on national surveys, M
Top 10
Age Structure by Region
Stacked by age groups, M
3 Groups
Disability Types — Detailed Table
Global estimates, M
Type
Total, M
Share
Distribution
Disability Severity Levels
Global structure by limitation levels
WHO ICF
💼 Employment of Persons with Disabilities
💼
36%
Employment Rate (PWD)
vs 62% — general labor market
👷
240M
Employed PWD
37% of working age (650M)
📉
−26 p.p.
Employment Gap
Average across all regions
🏆
Europe 48%
Top Region by Employment
Lowest: E. Mediterranean 22%
Employment Funnel: Of 1.3B persons with disabilities — not all are of working age. A large share consists of children and elderly with higher disability prevalence. Sources: ILO 2024, Return on Disability Group 2024.
👥
650M
Working Age
Ages 15–64 · ~50% of 1.3B
🔍
390M
Economically Active
In labor force · 3 in 10 (ILO 2024)
✅
240M
Actually Employed
37% of working age
⚠️
410M
Inclusion Potential
Working age but not employed
Breakdown of 1.3B M people
Of 1.3B — who is actually in the labor market
Employment Funnel ILO 2024
Progressive narrowing from 1.3B to employed
🔧 Labor Shortage — Where PWD Can Bridge the Gap
By 2030, the global shortage will reach 85M workers costing businesses $8.5T in unrealized revenue
(Korn Ferry / Fragomen, 2026).
410M working-age PWD outside the labor market — the largest untapped talent pool, especially for remote-compatible industries.
⚡
47M
Shortage Across 6 Industries by 2030
IT · Healthcare · Services · Education · Manufacturing · Construction
🎯
23M
PWD Closure Potential
49% of shortage with systemic inclusion
💻
85%
PWD Compatibility in IT
Top sector — 70% of shortage coverable
💸
$8.5T
Revenue Loss from Talent Shortage
Annually by 2030 · Korn Ferry 2026
Labor Shortage by 2030 M jobs
Global shortage by industry + share coverable by PWD
PWD Compatibility by Industry %
% of jobs accessible for various disability types
Employment Rate: PWD vs General Labor Market
% employed of economically active population — by WHO region
ILO 2023
Top Inclusion Industries (Global)
Share of employed PWD by industry, %
Top 10
Employment Gap by WHO Region
Difference in p.p. between general market and PWD (lower = better)
Gap, p.p.
Region
PWD, %
Market, %
Gap
Employment Rate by Disability Type
% employed of group population — ILO 2023 estimate
By Type
🤖 AI & Assistive Technologies — Impact on PWD Employment
AI tutors, Grammarly (dyslexia), GitHub Copilot (coding), predictive input
🧘 Mental Health (+8 p.p.)
Conversational AI agents, VR simulations for social skills and occupational adaptation
Remote work: +10% in employment for older PWD (2018–2022, Boston College CRR) · Youth PWD 16–24: participation growth ~60% since 2020 (SHRM 2025)
🇰🇿 Kazakhstan — Detailed PWD Employment Analysis
🇰🇿
39%
PWD Employment Rate in Kazakhstan
vs 65% — general labor market
👷
148K
Employed PWD in Kazakhstan
of 381K working age
📉
−26 p.p.
Gap with Kazakhstan Market
Employment quota: 2–4%
📊
732K
PWD in Kazakhstan
3.6% of population, 57% — working age
PWD Employment Industries in Kazakhstan
Share of employed PWD by industry, % — Ministry of Labor, Nov 2024
Leader — science and professional services (28%) — including work from home and remote employment.
Low share in manufacturing, construction and IT indicates accessibility and workplace adaptation barriers.
Occupational Structure of Employed PWD — Kazakhstan
Distribution by occupational groups, % — Ministry of Labor, 2024
Government PWD Employment Programs
PWD Employment Trends 2019–2024
% employed of working-age PWD · Ministry of Labor · * 2020–2021 estimated
📈 trend
Kazakhstan vs WHO Regions — PWD Employment Rate
% employed PWD of working age — ILO 2023 + Ministry of Labor 2024
🇰🇿 highlighted
Anatomy of the 27% → 39% Jump
Actual growth (+31K employed) vs effect of working-age base revision
+12 p.p.
Programs — Source of +31K Jobs
Participants by program, 2024 · Ministry of Labor · * estimated · † training
2024
Nosological Structure of 732K PWD
Share by condition among all PWD · Ministry of Labor, Nov 2024
context
Employment by Disability Type — Estimate
% employed of working age by condition · APA 2023, Turan Herald 2024 · unofficial data
estimate
🌍 International PWD Employment Comparison
Methodology: USA — BLS, employment ages 16–64 (March 2026); EU-27 — Eurostat EU-SILC, ages 20–64 (2024); Kazakhstan — Ministry of Labor (2024); World — WHO/ILO (2023). Gap = general market − PWD.
🇺🇸
37 p.p.
Gap in USA
PWD 38% · Market 75% (BLS 2026)
🇪🇺
24 p.p.
Gap in EU-27
PWD 52% · Market 76% (Eurostat 2024)
🇰🇿
26 p.p.
Gap in Kazakhstan
PWD 39% · Market 65% (Ministry of Labor 2024)
🌍
28 p.p.
Global Gap
PWD 37% · Market 65% (WHO/ILO 2023)
PWD Employment vs General Market working age
Employment rate, % — two bars per country/region
PWD Employment Trends 2019–2024 %
USA · EU-27 · Kazakhstan — trend comparison
🇺🇸 PWD Employment by US State — Census ACS 2023
🇰🇿
+8.6 p.p.
KZ ahead of US average
39% vs 30.4% (state average)
1️⃣
1 of 52
States above KZ level
only Utah — 39.5%
🏆
39,5%
US Leader — Utah
Census ACS 2023
📉
22,5%
Laggard — West Virginia
16.5 p.p. below KZ
Top 5 and Bottom 5 US States vs Kazakhstan, % PWD Employment
Conclusion: Kazakhstan (39%) exceeds the average across 52 US states and territories (30.4%) and trails only one state — Utah (39.5%).
The gap between the best and worst state is 17 p.p. (39.5% – 22.5%), indicating significant regional disparity within the US.
Lagging states (Florida, New York, West Virginia) have a higher share of elderly PWD and weaker employment support programs.
Priority of competitive integrated employment for PWD with severe disabilities. Signed by governor in 2011.
✅ KZ: equivalent — 2–4% quotas. Strengthen: require employers to create real (not token) positions
💰 11+ Employer Tax Incentives
Work Opportunity Tax Credit, Welfare to Work Tax Credit, workplace adaptation subsidies. Direct financial hiring incentives.
⚡ KZ: expand from 3–4 to 10+ incentives. Introduce workplace adaptation subsidy (up to 500 MCI)
🎓 USOR — Vocational Rehabilitation
Utah State Office of Rehabilitation: 90+ years of service, counseling, job placement, Pre-ETS for youth. Applications up +27.7% in 2024.
⚡ KZ: transform employment centers into full VR agencies with counseling and outcome tracking
🧑🎓 Pre-ETS — Youth Under 25
Pre-Employment Transition Services: career exploration, life skills, workplace practice for students with disabilities.
✅ KZ: college programs partially exist. Scale through employment centers + schools
🏠 Remote Work / Flexibility
90% of new PWD labor market entrants in 2021 — thanks to remote work. Salt Lake City tech companies — major employer.
✅ KZ: legislate PWD right to remote work. Introduce remote job quotas
📊 Choose to Work Utah
Work Ability Utah program: on-the-job support, job coaching, transition support from benefits to employment (SSI/SSDI incentives).
⚡ KZ: create equivalent — supported employment with benefit protection during job placement
Key finding: Utah's leadership is driven not by industry structure (similar to national average) but by a systemic approach: legislative mandate + multi-level employer incentives + robust VR service + flexible employment culture. All 6 components are replicable for Kazakhstan without fundamental economic restructuring.
🔍 Common Factors of Leaders — Utah · Nebraska · North Dakota · Minnesota
⚖️
4 of 4
Employment First Law
all leaders have legislative mandate
🏥
4 of 4
Advanced VR System
USOR, MN DEED, ND VR — all with Pre-ETS
📉
2,0–3,1%
Unemployment (General)
all leaders — historically low unemployment
💡
Not Industry-Driven
Not Economic Structure
occupational structure similar to national average
Common Factor Matrix of Leaders — What Is Replicable for KZ
✅ — factor present · ⚡ — partial · ❌ — absent
Factor
🏔️ Utah
🌾 Nebraska
⛽ North Dakota
🏙️ Minnesota
🇰🇿 KZ now
Employment First Law
✅ since 2011
✅ since 2013
✅ since 2012
✅ since 2014
⚡ quota 2–4%
VR Agency with Counseling
✅ USOR
✅ NVRS
✅ ND VR
✅ MN DEED
❌ employment centers only
Pre-ETS (Youth 14–21)
✅
✅
✅
✅
⚡ fragmented
10+ Employer Tax Incentives
✅ 11+
✅ 8+
✅ WOTC+
✅ 7+
❌ 3–4 incentives
Right to Remote Employment
✅
✅
✅
✅
⚡ not legislated
Low General Unemployment (<3,5%)
✅ 2,8%
✅ 2,8%
✅ 2,0%
✅ 3,1%
✅ ~4,8%
Conclusion: Leadership is NOT explained by industry structure (similar to national average across all 4 states).
Common denominator — a complete set of 5 measures: legislative mandate + VR agency + Pre-ETS + employer incentives + right to flexible employment.
KZ has ✅ only for unemployment. Three priorities: (1) transform employment centers → VR agencies, (2) expand incentives to 8–10+, (3) adopt a comprehensive Employment First law.
📊 PWD Employment Forecast for Kazakhstan 2025–2030